[flagged]
https://www.reuters.com/world/us/us-supreme-court-dealt-bide...
I'm not particularly trying to argue if it's good or bad, just that presidents often stretch the law to apply their agenda. I would tend to side more on the bad side, but it seems necessary due to senate dysfunction.
What you're trying to say is "usual" - if it is, indeed, usual for each of your presidents to do so.