Because they aren’t following the constitution or our laws. Congress has abdicated it’s responsibilities, but all of this is still illegal.
Voting a new president into office doesn't grant that person extra-constitutional powers. What they say during an election doesn't create those new powers, either.
As others have said, this is not constitutional.
Because the US has a constitution. Congress (not the Executive branch) allocates funding and the Executive Branch (in this case a Billionaire who's friendly with the President) cannot decide not to spend the money Congress has already decided to spend.
How exactly is it not constitutional? All of this seems like well established precedent. He's advising the president and the president is taking actions.
Isn't that well established precedent that's been going on for a long time?
Also if you believe it's not constitutional it still doesn't make sense how it can be a "coup".