If your interview process is susceptible to AI then you don't need to hire for the job. Just use an AI and prompt it.
The job you are therefore hiring for is now trivial. If it weren't, no amount of AI could pass your interview process.
The job you are therefore hiring for is now trivial. If it weren't, no amount of AI could pass your interview process.
An interview has to be hard enough to filter those that are unqualified but also easy enough that the right person can pass with some minor preparation. If an interviewer asked me for the equivalent of production-ready code to add support for custom hardware in the Linux kernel I'd either reply with my freelance hourly rate or I'd end the interview.
Yeah, ideally. Meanwhile the market evolved to asking Leetcode hards on the spot.
As usual, companies take a good concept and milk it to the point where you need to cheat or make studying leetcode your full time job to ace it. I'm not to sympathetic.
(PS yes, I've been asked to do what was essentially spec work a few times. Woudl have been smarter to reply with an invoice, but I was too tired and just said no).
this is implying interview process actually showcases someone would be good at a job when it isnt
when has leetcode ever translated to web dev... fuckin never lol.
Why do you let your interview process for web devs use leetcode?