Hacker News Reader

There's lots of them, but I respectfully submit that doing something about it in the present - whatever you determine that to be, given your skills and inclinations - is a far higher priority than the educational byproduct for future generations.

Using your Weimar example, I would not argue that Germany or humanity is/are better off for having gone through the cataclysm of WW2. In terms of building context, you might find it helpful to read this dry but very detailed examination of the nazi administrative state, and how it delivered economic resources to its political clients through a combination of reorganization, financial engineering, and striaght-up theft:

https://archive.org/details/hitlersbeneficia00alyg

On a more abstract level, try 'The logic of political survival' by Smith & Bueno de Mesquita. both books will give you a useful framework within which to assess the contextual significance of ongoing news events.

Thanks!

I also think this is a good summary for those who had never heard of Weimar before: https://archive.is/xh2Ci

But like most summaries, it suffers a bit from focusing on the key events, and not capturing this sort of ... change in the ambient noise floor, and what relationship the average citizen had to what was going on, and what perception of events. I think it's the "Would you have been able to tell that it'd get this bad?" is kind of the more interesting part. A political weather forecasting model, if you will.

> I think it's an unprecedented opportunity to record the history of a downfall using modern tools, and future generations might benefit enormously.

Well, the German atrocities of the Third Reich are well-documented and we are probably just a few years behind the U.S.

The best documentary won't help to prevent backsliding into superstition and barbarism if people don't believe them.

On the other hand, the history of downfall is basically self-documenting itself in real-time and people still don't believe it because people simply don't care about things that don't fit into their ideological borders or their perception of reality.

Truth doesn't exist anymore and thus anything that relies on truth.

On the contrary, there used to be "the spoils system." I'm just a sideline listener but I think that's an appropriate lens to look at this through rather than some severe negative, or dangerously harmful trend.

I think trying to bar such a system simply would make the same things covert.

> When I learned about the disruption of the Weimar Republic in highschool, a thing our teacher did was make copious use of newspaper clippings to explain he delta between ground truth and public sentiment, and how certain narratives increased in frequency, etc. He had personally spent quite some time in old archives and on microfilm readeers to create his little library. Something like this, but with much more data.

That sounds interesting. Wish it had been converted into a blogpost or something for more permanence.

Check out KeepTrack

https://www.reddit.com/r/Keep_Track/

Also has a Patreon

Thanks!

slow?

IMO the LegalEagle YouTube channel has done a fantastic job:

https://youtube.com/@legaleagle

They explain the laws in question (often with historical context of their creation), answer common procedural questions, separate the facts of the case from political rhetoric & misinformation, and give an objective analysis of possible outcomes. They are certainly not unbiased, but in the "we are biased against criminal behavior" way.