> Good Commandment 3. Thou shalt limit the duration of a center. ...
> To hit home runs, it’s wise to have many at bats. ...
> It’s hard to predict information technology trends much longer than five years. ...
> US Graduate student lifetimes are about five years. ...
> You need a decade after a center finishes to judge if it was a home run. Just 8 of the 12 centers in Table I are old enough, and only 3 of them—RISC, RAID, and the Network of Workstations center—could be considered home runs. If slugging .375 is good, then I’m glad that I had many 5-‐year centers rather than fewer long ones.
(Network of Workstations > Google)
Now, Berkeley has been a fount of research on the topic, no question about that. I myself worked there (on Bloom, with Joe Hellerstein). But forgetting the other top universities of the world is a bit ... amusing?
Let's take one of the many lists of foundational papers of this field:
http://muratbuffalo.blogspot.com/2021/02/foundational-distri...
How many came out of Berkeley, let alone a recent entry like the AMPLab?
I am not going to make every contextualizing comment an authoritative bibliography , you of all people could have added that w/o being snarky and starting this whole subthread.
I didn't think you were saying that most distributed systems work happening at Berkeley harks back to earlier work at Berkeley. That's a bit obvious.
The only way I can interpret "most distributed systems work now" is a statement about work happening globally. In which case it is a sweeping and false generalization.
Is there another interpretation?