I call them "tweets". Seriously, most tweets are ads, so just charge people to send them. If you have over ~1,000 followers then you are a de facto marketer and you could pay per tweet per active follower.
I call them "tweets". Seriously, most tweets are ads, so just charge people to send them. If you have over ~1,000 followers then you are a de facto marketer and you could pay per tweet per active follower.
> If you have over ~1,000 followers then you are
> a de facto marketer and you could pay per tweet
> per active follower.
Then we start seeing "follower bombs" where the goal is to increase someone's number of followers until they are forced to pay for Twitter.So, so wrong. I'm not far off that, and while I tweet now and then about work stuff, it's all from a point of view of "this is what I'm doing", not "this is what I want people to see". If I changed job to a completely different industry tomorrow, I'd tweet the same stuff about the new work, regardless of whether it fits my followers.
I like twitter enough that I'd pay for a premium service if there was one and its benefits were slightly interesting, but I wouldn't pay just because I breached some arbitrary line in my account.