It is better that 1,000 guilty people go free than one innocent person be held. These "technicalities" are supposed to be one of the ways we protect against that, at the same time as they are intended to protect against people's rights being violated. This is why evidence must be presented that has been gathered by methods that prevent things like this from happening.

So you're suggesting a family member murder the judge or some powerful individual whose wealth puts them above the law? That's a weird take.

Nobody else calls not doing your job right a 'technicality.'