> Why care whether something is AI slop or human slop? It’s not worth reading in either case.
The problem is human slop is typically easy to detect by grammar and other clues.
AI slop is often confidently incorrect.
The problem is human slop is typically easy to detect by grammar and other clues.
AI slop is often confidently incorrect.
I'm not sure this is true. There have been a lot of times where I see a very well made video or article about some interesting topic but when I go to the comments I end up finding some corrections or realizing that the entire premise of the content was poorly researched yet well put together.
It is worth noting though that the other 99% of human-made slop doesn't make it to you since it never gets popular, hence why hard to filter human-made slop can seem over-represented just through survivorship bias.
I am noticing it in work emails a lot now - poor performers cutting and pasting chatgpt content with no validation.