$500 billion is $500 billion.
If new technology means we can get more for a dollar spent, then $500 billion gets more, not less.
If new technology means we can get more for a dollar spent, then $500 billion gets more, not less.
The money is not spent. Deepseek published their methodology, incumbents can pivot and build on it. No one knows what the optimal path is, but we know it will cost more.
I can assure you that OpenAI won't continue to produce inferior models at 100x the cost.
What happens if that money is being actually spent, then some people constantly catch up but don't reveal that they are doing it for cheap? You think that it's a competition but what actually happening is that you bleed out of your resources at some point you can't continue but they can.
Like the star wars project that bankrupted the soviets.
Wasn't that a G.W Bush Jr thing?
Then the Open Source world came out of the left and b*tch slapped all those head honchos and now its like this.
- The hardware purchased for this initiate can be used for multiple architectures and new models. If DeepSeek means models are 100x as powerful, they will benefit
- Abstraction means one layer is protected from direct dependency on implementation details of another layer
- It’s normal to raise an investment fund without knowing how the top layers will play out
Hope that helps? If you can be more specific about your confusion I can be more specific in answering.