If you wouldn't mind reviewing https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html and taking the intended spirit of the site more to heart, we'd be grateful.
If you wouldn't mind reviewing https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html and taking the intended spirit of the site more to heart, we'd be grateful.
Moving ADA protected accessibility concerns into the literal DEI departments (I don't mean individual people) is clearly part of that attempt to "harden" themselves from executive orders and top down policy changes.
Indeed the ATF has just blatantly violated the executive order ending DEI programs[1].
Ultimately it's the bureaucracy using accessibility as a shield who are responsible for it being attacked.
What I say is certainly... pithy but I take exception with saying any of it is un-substantive or flamebait.
[0] https://www.cnn.com/2024/12/22/politics/resistance-trump-lib...
[1] https://www.msn.com/en-us/politics/government/atf-accused-of...
If you had posted this later comment originally, it would have been fine, or almost fine—it's probably still too much of a political battle post to be completely fine.