Hacker News Reader

I’m not sure where your figures are coming from, did you mean at the moment of posting your comment? If you look at the integral over the year, California does decently well[1] on renewables, and the people paying for it help blunt the competitive edge of the tremendous federal subsidies enjoyed by fossil fuels.

[1]https://www.energy.ca.gov/data-reports/energy-almanac/califo...

View on HN

> did you mean at the moment of posting your comment?

Yes, right this moment. You can see this here: https://www.caiso.com/todays-outlook/supply

> does decently well[1] on renewables

Technically it does decently well on combined "non greenhouse gas + renewables." This is a rather self serving categorization of generation sources and might not be what people buying "100% renewable" energy think they're actually getting.

In any case, subtracting Nuclear and Hydro, if more than half the kWh purchased in the state are purchased as "100% renewable", they cannot all be possibly served by renewables even in the aggregate.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com