This has already happened in 1.0, and plenty of other examples of it from history. But one would have to crack open a history book to know about that, and the populace is trending to banning books rather than opening them.
They'll just break out the magic markers on all the dis-favorable weather reports.
That makes a pretty good first order approximation of what is and isn't scientific, and worth spending taxpayer dollar on.
Science isn't prescriptive (doesn't tell you what to do), it's descriptive. Prescriptions are policy and have nothing to do with science.
Namely, do the "green" policies make sense given that:
1. China will only increase it's total energy and resource consumption
2. And so will India and rest of the developing nations (unless you want them to be relegated to being perpetual backwater shitholes?)
All these will result in ever increasing CO2 output and pollution as these and other countries develop and transition. Many "green" products - solar panels, inverters, etc are made in China. And they are gearing up to be a very strong competitor in electric vehicles too. Which will futher increase the trade deficit and directly subsidize the competitors.
Most sensible discussions - as far as I can tell - deal with these realpolitik considerations first and foremost.