I thought this was an interesting meditation on the limits of AI and how ordinary people don't see those limits, wrapped up in a context I normally wouldn't expect to see AI at all.
It's quite a different level of commitment to truth than one usually runs across these days. Instead of a world of meme and vibes, a costly commitment to only say things that are true.
It worries me a lot more that governments and the like will also be in denial about what they can do with AI. I can ignore low quality apologetics, I cannot ignore the government (I have to pay taxes, for example).
I feel like the way around this is hermenutics and exegesis and that's where things differ substantially between the bible and llms. The bible has both whereas LLMs are arguably approached hermenutically, but have no exegesis to speak of.