I imagine almost everyone will add bad data in a study at some point with the best of intentions.
I imagine almost everyone will add bad data in a study at some point with the best of intentions.
This is why one of the best ways to lose weight is to just keep a food diary / count calories. You don't need any special / fad diet, just the act of trying to keep a note of everything you eat will cause you to stop and think, "I don't need to eat this".
You can give yourself an ability akin to time travel by writing things down first.
If I write down the calories afterwards, I get the "oh, I shouldn't have done that" feeling at times. I'd like a little time travel button that takes me back to before I did, and let me adjust my behaviour and run through the situation again. If I write it down first I get to have the "oh, that's not worth it" feeling up front and decide to do something else.
This made a big difference for me, both lowering what I was eating and making me happier about the choices I made.
Turned out I was also stupidly deficient on protein day to day.
Getting protein in takes dedication & awareness
I did a daily shake for a while as an after gym recovery food and I still had more calories from carbs than protein. it's just difficult.
One can (and should) extend that concept to anything. Be conscious about what you do. Then you likely know, if you are not doing good - and can change it.
Eating homemade stir fried celtuce [1]? Homemade steamed marble goby [2]? Nope, out of luck. They only have nutrition info for packaged mac and cheese.
I think tracking calories for a couple of weeks can be very enlightening for a lot of people, granted you don't have a personality type where this can get you into trouble. But for the long haul it's not really useful or even feasible, you're better off getting to know what sort of way of eating suits you best and how to correct if you're getting off course. Anyone can stick to a very strict regime for three months, but the trick is to stick to a proper diet you can enjoy for three decades and then three decades more.
I've been tracking consistently for about 5 years. It's feasible.
And even if you don't record with 100pc accuracy, there's still a lot of value