But in some way, I hope people don't do that with hn. I sometimes read helpful product reviews on an amazon product. "I tried the XIWSHDX salad spinner, and I found it to be very useful. blah blah."
I think I'm afraid of "A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds", or possibly will just hide good organic content.
I tried to reflect on some lessons from this, because I learned from the experience that small things (e.g. the title) can make large differences.
Which means that often good ideas or nice articles might get unrecognized, because they lack a good "packaging".
Making sure those things are on point helps.
But that should be it.
But I had never heard of using that same trick to solve puzzles where you find how two pictures differ. And I tried it out and it worked for me.
It took something I had limited application for and turned it into a slightly less limited power. And a great party trick. That’s sort of a superpower :D
In this case though, it's a dude posting on his own blog. I'm fine with whatever title he found cool.
"One just needs to write $currentTrendingFad to get the same effect"
Not too long ago it could have been crypto/blockchain, or rewriting $app in $lang
That's the thing of viral is it is just trend following, so recognizing the trend helps the changes of going viral
A quick algolia search seems to support that too. Most of the highest voted stories about cryptocurrency and blockchain are negative news and opinions. There are a few highly voted stories about cryptocurrencies and blockchain too, but far fewer.
If you search for something specific like Bitcoin, there looks at a glance to be more positive or neutral stories with high number of votes, and still a few negative ones about that too.
You’ll often find a few positive comments on the stories though, so it’s not like everyone hates it. Not saying that. But overwhelmingly I feel that HN readers as a whole range from disinterested to actively against anything blockchain and that this has been the case for a long time.
And by the way, absolutely no hate to the author, I totally get it, and fairly ambivalent to it. It is what it is.