There's lots of good criticism of the actual article to expand on here, calling someone a white supremacist because they used an incredibly common title format does not add to that.
https://x.com/RichardHanania/status/1878829377338966310
> One way to understand conservative/liberal differences is to think of conservatives as the people who are intellectually limited and lazy.
https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2023/08/richard-hanania-raci...
> “I truly sucked back then,” Hanania admits, confirming that, between 2008 and 2012, he posted pseudonymously on several white-supremacist and misogynistic websites […] He confesses he “had few friends or romantic successes and no real career prospects” at the time and was projecting his “personal unhappiness onto the rest of the world.”
He still cites people who contribute to these websites that he describes as "white-supremacist and misogynistic", though. That seems awfully odd for somebody who claims that these beliefs are odious. I also really don't know how else to interpret a call to overturn Griggs v Duke.
Not sure why you are mentioning Project 2025 or the civil rights stuff, you lost us there.
It is possible that PG is not aware of Hanania's book. But I think the connection is worth interrogating.
>It's worth noting that the title of this article