In Greenland’s case, Denmark has guaranteed a right to an independence referendum. A closer parallel would be the status of Puerto Rico as a US territory. The choice to apply for statehood, remain a territory, or vote for independence has no clear majority. However there isn’t anything that would prevent independence for Puerto Rico if that’s what the people there wanted.
Money for votes is the issue I have, regardless of the hypothetical.
In any event I agree with you that buying votes is a perversion of democracy and should not be allowed.
You cite legalistic reasons that make it impossible to annex Alaska. I'm sure similar legalistic reasons can be found to reverse Denmark's offer in an age that has turned neo-colonial.
exactly a independence referendum
and that is what Greenland wants independence not being a US territory
like think about it why would they want to be US territory it's pretty clear cut worse for them in close to every aspect. Like they would have less self control then under Denmark, they would have a way worse health care system, way worse labor rights, way less democracy, worse legal system etc. No one (who is well informed) in Greenland wants to be a US territory.
it would have betrayed all of it's core values and it's founders would turn around for shame if such a thing where possible for dead people (EDIT: well at lest some of them)
No. Nobody proposed a Greenland referendum where all Danes can vote. Greenland ≈ Alaska, Denmark ≈ USA.