> “Today I learned that we have a sustainability team,” Mullenweg said.
If this is true: Is there any possible explanation for such a statement where leadership comes out unscathed?
If this is true: Is there any possible explanation for such a statement where leadership comes out unscathed?
The Sustainability agenda , quoted by the article, appears excessive to me as well - and it resonates with me why Mullenweg is asking for a different approach.
With the dramas going on, shutting down the channel was a dick move , though.
- Stuff going on you're not aware of?
- Things spiraling out of control/becoming self-directed?
- You forgetting what you did or said a few months/years ago, and getting mad on others in consequence?
- Your intentions not well understood?
All of this is on you (the leader). That's reason for resignation.
The behavior around it is just childish IMO. I wonder how this affects him being able to do his job.
Forgetting? That’s a lot of good faith on your part. Where in the time of people denying everything even with undeniable video/audio evidence and their target audience believes them. If you don’t believe then you were not the target audience and are irrelevant
Bingo. If someone wants to be the leader, then they have to deal with leadership. That means that everything going on under your leadership is your responsibility. We've let this slide as a society, letting leaders take credit for successes and then blaming others for failures.
It's not true. It's a blatant lie, as the embedded video in the article proves.