Hacker News Reader

Comment by bragr | Hacker News Reader

>M-CAM 1 took this long-exposure photograph of Mercury's north pole

I'm curious how this works. The dynamic range between the sunlit parts and the dark portions must be huge at that distance from the Sun. Anyone have the technical details on the camera or post processing they use to achieve this? Is it really a long exposure or is it a series of photos at different exposures stitched together?

Edit: details at the bottom seem to imply a single photo, but that "long exposure" really isn't that long

>This image of Mercury's surface was taken by M-CAM 1 [...] using an integration time of 40 milliseconds.

View on HN

If you're thinking that long exposure automatically means something longer than 1 second, it might not mean long exposure to you.

I'd guess this is a fixed aperture system where the main way to control the exposure is with shutter speed. But for images taken in bright sunlight, you can use shutter speeds 1/250, 1/1000, 1/2000, or even higher type numbers. In those terms, 40 milliseconds is 10 times slower/longer than 1/250.

So for the M-CAM 1 system, 40 milliseconds could be an extremely long exposure

Integration implies multiple pictures taken and stacked. This is how we do deep sky astrophotography on our back yards.

Integration over time and integration over bit fields are both ways we do deep sky astrophotography. Integration over time is used to collect more photons without saturating sensor wells and integrating bit fields (stacking) is used to increase signal to noise

What does that mean exactly? What's the relation between integration time and exposure time?

I think this is their terminology for exposure time. The sensor is integrating charge from incident photons during this period. Of course the image could be stacked also!

Edit: the sensor is integrating CURRENT. Charge is the integral!

Wondering same. If my math is right, this was a 1/25 sec. exposure. (40/1000)

Reply on news.ycombinator.com