Hacker News Reader

[dead]

So is that "critique"

Do you have any substantive criticism you could share?

For example how it cites the cass report that's been debunked quite a few times already

The Cass Review covers a lot of ground. Which parts of relevance to that article are you claiming have been "debunked", and on what basis?

I posted one of the better critiques (by Yale) already in the parent comment you're reacting to