But what if they want to know they are finding the correct answer?
I think basic definitions for LLMs are solidly within the bounds of what we would expect e.g. chatgpt to be competent at. The task (defining terms) is simple and the specific content (basic LLM stuff) is easy to check by anyone who works on the LLM.
I agree with the general sentiment that we should not just blindly trust LLMs though.
Asking anonymous people on a forum would be much better.
At least a forum with domain-specific knowledge.
And people to go "no, that's wrong" if someone posts something that's wrong.
No, any answer will do.
tbf, the gp comment said 125MB and then 3B, which would be pretty confusing, as it's a typo and should be 125M.