Some get their rocks off interfacing with the relationship between their art and those who engage with it. Others are entirely satisfied with the process of making art itself. The former is an externalized process, the latter is internalized.
Different strokes for different folks, but you can put me in a box with no human interaction and a keyboard, and I will find no end of entertainment through self-exploration via the artistic process.
I can see the artistic value of the full magic act, but does that make a tool used in the act to itself be art on its own?
Is the bow used by a violin player in itself a piece of art? Perhaps it could be. But if it's burried?
> Is the bow used by a violin player in itself a piece of art
A pencil is a work of art.
What the artist thinks or desires is often irrelevant. (Edited)
But discovering the path to the goal also has meaning.
Every little step down the path, the surprising things that are easy, the unexpected things that are hard, is worth celebrating. They are all taking us where we want to go! The ups and downs are the path.
And the path is a teacher.