It seems Apple are very passionate about analysing your photos for some reason, regardless if you yourself are.
It seems Apple are very passionate about analysing your photos for some reason, regardless if you yourself are.
A lot of Apple's defaults are just plain bizarre. Why the hell is Spotlight seeing source code mimetypes and feeding it to the search index?
Why is this even a question, do people not look at the settings at all?
No, I expect defaults that aren't asinine from a company that bills themselves as a premium experience for software developers. It should be common sense, for the purposes of providing software to both ordinary users and software developers, to omit source files that aren't relevant search results. It's one of the most annoying features on Windows too, you'd hope Apple would see the writing on the wall and just fix it.
Harboring hope was my mistake, though. Sold my Mac in 2018 and haven't felt a desire to daily-drive MacOS since.
Isn’t this fragile to pollution from end users?
What if we all ran A local Image generator trained on our own photos… But slightly broken… And just flooded their photo hash collection with garbage?
Now what ?
This would be a very good flushing action. Lot would be learned by seeing who got angry about this and how angry they got…
They are also not using your personal photos to feed the location database, most likely public sources and/or Apple Maps data. If they are relying on GPS-tagged public photos alone, you could probably mess up a system like this by spoofing GPS location en-masse and posting them online for years, but for what purpose?
https://kozubik.com/items/FlushingAction/
Flood that system with garbage and let's see who gets upset and how they communicate their upset.
If the system is architected as advertised it shouldn't be a problem ...
It's directly tied to features they provide in their photo app. This is hardly obscure.