It’s quite amazing how you abusive and toxic authoritarian types hide behind framing things in made up terms like “ideological battle comments” and “flamebait” to add a veneer of process authority because you are too scared to simply admit to yourself that, you, the tyrant with all the power and control don’t like something so therefore it is “flamebait” and “ideological battle comments”.

Don’t bother with your veneer of made up terms and condescending and dehumanizing “you’ve unfortunately” … “been doing things I don’t like and I have the power even though I hide behind a process that keeps me believing I’m not the bad person I am”.

Just do it. Just abuse your power like you want to.

Tyrants are tyrants, even when they have “democratic elections” and proclaim how they support free speech as long as it is speech they approve.

Let’s get this done with. You want to abuse all the tools you have to frame and control the speech of others, so just do it. Stop acting like you have some reasonable process to make yourself feel better about what you are.

It seems bad faith to assume the OP is using the term modernism specifically to refer to the Modernism movement rather than the other use of the word "a practice, usage, or expression peculiar to modern times", per Merriam-Webster.

Also, drawing the connection between Eugène Viollet-le-Duc and Modernism architecture to argue for removing Eugène's glass with a more modern style ignores his own motivation for his restoration which was to restore Notre-Dame to it's original gothic style. The reason Eugène's stained glass is there is because past canons had "modernized" it by replacing the original medieval stained glass with plain white panes.