The source, https://www.nplusonemag.com/issue-49/essays/casual-viewing/, seems like a much better article.
But it is hilarious in a meta kind of way that a bottom feeder "summarize real writing done by others, and slap on a clickbait headline" website pretends to have the moral high ground on this issue. I wonder what the guidance they give t to their writers is, and what metrics they're pushed to improve.