As someone who lived through the 90s where a well written email could see your domain terminated, a reputable registrar meant way more than low prices. And in some cases even expensive ones would rule against you (looking at you netsol).
As someone who lived through the 90s where a well written email could see your domain terminated, a reputable registrar meant way more than low prices. And in some cases even expensive ones would rule against you (looking at you netsol).
1) They had a good reputation on here at the time (10 years ago?)
2) They have a nice panel for DNS config
3) I wanted to separate my registration from my hosting
4) I think it's a pretty well-known registrar
I'm concerned by the OP, though.
Before that you were much better off using a registrar with a known dispute process (verisign) or in a jurisdiction which required a legal precedent (German registrar joker.com leapfrogged into stardom during this time)
Also the process of locking domains came out of these actions
Made self-hosting interesting when your home IP changed, or you moved, and that was where you hosted your DNS and email.