I once toured Washington's home Mount Vernon. He was probably the richest man in America at the time.
I wouldn't prefer his lifestyle, at all.
Plenty of people have lived in towns and villages which weren't entirely dominated by big businesses and they got along just fine.
If you define poverty as being in the lowest 20% of income, then you can never eliminate poverty.
> Plenty of people have lived in towns and villages which weren't entirely dominated by big businesses and they got along just fine.
You wouldn't have an internet phone without big business. Nor a car. Nor a washing machine. Nor indoor plumbing. Nor oranges in winter. Nor a hospital. Nor air conditioning. Nor electricity. Nor sanitation. Nor fertilizer.
In fact, getting rid of business would result in the death of more than 90% of the population. And likely much more.
Either the economy hasn't grown in any significant way over the last century, or clearly it was possible to purchase cars and washing machines, and transport goods, and have hospitals and air conditioning without "big business" of the scale that the context of this thread is clearly referring to.
And the ancient Romans had indoor plumbing.
Only a handful of rich Romans.
> or clearly it was possible to purchase cars and washing machines, and transport goods, and have hospitals and air conditioning without "big business" of the scale that the context of this thread is clearly referring to.
Nope. It took Ford's big business to be able to make cars cheap enough for the masses. Before Ford, it was a luxury item for a handful of wealthy people.
Railroads were big business, too. You cannot have much of an economy with just horses.
Yes. And therefore, they didn't need modern industrial capitalism with global corporations to do it.
And, just noting the moving goalposts here, your claim wasn't that such amenities weren't affordable without modern capitalism, because even with it, many people struggle to afford them, it was that they were impossible at any scale other than "big business."
>It took Ford's big business to be able to make cars cheap enough for the masses. Before Ford, it was a luxury item for a handful of wealthy people.
Ford at the time of the Model T wouldn't be considered a "big business" in the modern context. Again, you seem to think any business counts as "big business." Using the same term to refer to Ford in 1910 and, say, Amazon or Wal-Mart today is ridiculous.
Obviously Ford would become "big business" but just as obviously Ford is one example of it being possible to manufacture goods at what would be far closer to "mom and pop" scale today.
You could also make artisan steel before the big steel industry. About all you could do with it was make swords and a suit of armor at terrific expense.
> of it being possible to manufacture goods at what would be far closer to "mom and pop" scale today.
Before the industrial revolution, 90% of the population worked on the farm, and famine was still a regular occurrence. There was no available work force to create artisan cars and artisan indoor plumbing for the masses. Nor was there food to feed them.
Some years ago, I toured Jefferson's Monticello mansion and estate. In the back yard there was a nailery, where the slaves operated a small forge and hammered out nails, one by one. Today you can just buy a box of nails for a few dollars, thanks to big steel and the nail making machining requiring little additional labor. I don't know how many nails could be made in a day's work by an artisan, but I doubt it is that many, and it's cost you at least $150 for that box of nails.
Nails were so valuable in those days people would burn houses down just to get the nails.
I had my roof replaced a year ago. After the roofers left, I spent a fair amount of time combing the yard to get all the discarded nails out of it. The nails were so cheap it was not worth anyone's time to pick them up. (I picked them up because I didn't want to step on them. I did anyway, driving the nail nearly through the sole of my shoe.)
Merry Christmas, or whatever.
https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/italian-smes-small-pretty-str...
[easy] Echo devices: where the UX just keeps getting worse as well. Prime Video: now has ads as well. Washington Post: firewall so never read it Prescription drugs: I use a Walmart-branded drug plan serviced by a local Safeway. Better than Amazon directly, I suppose
[moderate] Kindle: I don't really need paid ebooks vs. the library etc. but do have a Kindle library. Kindle Unlimited: library used books sales now for cheap reads. Amazon books: Barnes & Noble for shipping, so far so good. Amazon Prime: do I really need more stuff, quickly?
[hard] Whole Foods: the UX of Safeway stores is surprisingly worse
I find this a healthy exercise as it makes me less of an impulsive consumer. I haven't decided if Target, Walmart etc. should also be avoided.
The problem with Walmart isn't just that it's a big chain store.
It's that it's a staggeringly, unchallengeably huge chain store, that can afford to operate a given location at a loss effectively indefinitely in order to drive out competition—including competition from other big chain stores, if they want to.