Yep. There are always droves of "it belongs in a museum" crowds, but when you ask if they want it there is only silence.
Yep. There are always droves of "it belongs in a museum" crowds, but when you ask if they want it there is only silence.
It wouldn't matter if the heirs value it or not, because it wouldn't have been theirs. Because he let it remain in his estate, he left it to his heirs to decide what to do with it, and clearly, they did not care to keep it as a public collection, nor to endeavor to keep it together as a collection. I guess I should have visited it when I had the chance.
I went to go back one day with friends, and found it had permanently closed in the interim, apparently because they couldn't afford the rent. [1]
(People in that thread love to complain about only getting a 1Y lease - but if they needed to move in a hurry, there's sort of a time crunch, and the longer the lease terms, the less favorable they're likely to be, since the landlord probably wants to hedge against prices going sharply up over that window...)
[1] - https://www.reddit.com/r/pinball/comments/18wsn6/national_pi...
I totally understand the impulse but it's just not realistic to preserve everything.
It's not really realistic to expect everyone that values something to also be in a position to house and care for it. Someone can acknowledge that something should be protected and displayed without taking on the burden of doing it themselves.
This whole "if it's so great why don't you take it" attitude that comes up anytime someone laments the lost of a cultural/historic/artistic item is just negativity for the sake of negativity.
>I totally understand the impulse but it's just not realistic to preserve everything.
Agreed, but many of the comments here go too far in trying to denigrate the folks expressing the impulse without being able to act upon it.