Hacker News Reader

The test frameworks typically output the passing/failing function names. Adding spaces like this make them more human readable.

expectInternalServerErrorOnBadInput

Vs

expect internal server error on bad input

View on HN

Isn't this breaking Jakob's law of the rest of the tooling though? I can se flows borking with something like "x failed at expect" in a majority of reporting tools not specifically meant to deal with this spaces in functions stuff.

Not really—-most CI reporting is based off junit/testng report XML files. I doubt your CI reporting is parsing out test names with regexes out of log files.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com