It doesn't really disprove anything. The problem with this type of analysis is that it's based on engines which are many levels above human play.

While watching the commentary, you will often see comments from super GMs like "engine suggest move XY, but it's not a move a human player would find/consider". The move may be optimal, but only if you're at this Stockfish 3600 ELO level because you need to precisely execute a series of 3600 ELO moves to exploit it. A suboptimal move for 3600 ELO player may be the optimal move for a 2800 ELO player, but Stockfish won't tell you.

I'm not saying this analysis isn't interesting, but we shouldn't overinterpret it.