Hacker News Reader

Couldn't they add something in their TOS indicating that AI assistance is common and they aren't responsible for what their content creators do?

What if they spin the service as "an experience" rather than specifically about interaction with a model? And who'se to say that a model has to be a live model anyway?

View on HN

> Couldn’t they add something in their TOS indicating that AI assistance is common and they aren’t responsible for what their content creators do?

They (1) do have a policy (and separate standardized fan/creator contract) about their limited responsibility for fan/creator interactions, and that contract includes a fan acknowledgement that creators may use third-party assistance in interactions, but also (2) a policy that requires creator to explicitly disclose any AI-created content as AI-created.

It’s just Tim down the block. I’d love it if they had to put a disclaimer at the very least if they are using any services.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com