[flagged]
Surely he bears some responsibility for making UHC the worst to deal with and the having the highest rejection rate?
> What I do see is a strong push by media ...
Why would the media push a narrative against any executive if it wasn't already part of the zeitgeist? The media has consistently exhibited strong class solidarity in my experience.
> Doctors well-know this, and they become doctors knowing this.
I'm sure you are aware that doctors are not a monolith. Gp is not making things up: I'll second them with the less-than-sorrowful response elicited by the news of the CEOs demise among administrative staff in my circles (who know how the industry works and what role is performs)
> The Media last sympathized with and incited murderous violence in the 2020 election period.
Gee, I wonder if the public discontent the media and politicians tapped into in 2020 has abated or gotten worse since. It appears you refuse to acknowledge that a huge fraction of the population is unhappy with the status quo across the world (see number of governments voted out). That America has a populist president-elect isn't surprising
If so, and barring subjectivity and narrative, then not responsibility with a penalty of death. Very obviously.
>Why would the media push a narrative against any executive if it wasn't already part of the zeitgeist? The media has consistently exhibited strong class solidarity in my experience.
Extrajudicial murder and domestic terrorism are part of the zeitgeist of most people? This is your claim?
This is some kind of new standard for a stupid statement. Aside from you being wrong in more than one aspect, I'm not going to debate your sense of media class loyalty. Which you are wrong about in a multifaceted manner.
The fact is that they are pushing the narrative. It's in black and white.
>I'm sure you are aware that doctors are not a monolith. Gp is not making things up: I'll second them with the less-than-sorrowful response elicited by the news of the CEOs demise among administrative staff in my circles (who know how the industry works and what role is performs)
I didn't say that they were. But they are largely, monolithically not insane, not murderer adjacent, and not domestic terrorist adjacent.
Your appeal to authority stories are either total bs or aberrations full of people that should probably be surveilled by law enforcement.
>Gee, I wonder if the public discontent the media and politicians tapped into in 2020 has abated or gotten worse since. It appears you refuse to acknowledge that a huge fraction of the population is unhappy with the status quo across the world (see number of governments voted out). That America has a populist president-elect isn't surprising
Trump supporters are not remotely supportive of this, barring fringe crazies and false identities.
The media didn't "tap into" anything in 2020. They wound-up a vast quasi-criminal underclass and organized domestic terrorists for nine months, and over thirty murders of innocents, running up to an election for a candidate that they were on a war-footing against for the four years prior.
They gave tacit and even direct permission to riot, and political cover for the riots, which is all that these criminals need in any given timeframe to carry out domestic terrorism and extrajudicial murders.
Now they're at it again, right after another election.
People who sympathize with this type of thing are, at the least, domestic terrorism adjacent. If not directly supportive.
You should be monitored.
So, the guys who brought/assembled gallows to the capital and were chanting "Hang Mike Pence" are not supportive of extrajudicial killings? We're not on the same plane of existence, you and I.
> People who sympathize with this type of thing are, at the least, domestic terrorism adjacent
I remember a chyron at a national convention stating "We are all domestic terrorists" - perhaps stoking that flame was not a great idea now, was it? What's your take on those who refuse to take any action on mass shootings at schools?
> You should be monitored.
You'd love that, wouldn't you? The Stasi would be proud. Establishing a police state with dragnet surveillance is a fantastic tool for fighting disaffection and will surely improve morale.
Most people quite obviously don't want to incite violence, but at the same time, doctors can't get much sympathy for this particular CEO.
You know what i first thought when i heard this story? "At least he didn't shoot a hospital". You know what my second thought on this? "I hope there is enough hero worshiping for this killer so that mass shooters try their hand at murdering CEO instead, at least it's a single victim" (that is also because 2 days prior, a friend i've met in a youth hostel a few years back was involved in a mass shooting around Chicago).
I won't participate in the hero worship, i despise all killers. But still, am i the only one who had those thoughts?