You realize they already have their own ARM CPUs and run their own NVME drives with their own controllers right? And these generally outperform others in the same class.
And all this ignoring that kindle and Alexa are both market-defining products that either dominated (kindle) or created a new market that didn’t really exist before (Alexa).
There’s valid criticisms to levy, but try to be dispassionate and analytical as emotional comments don’t raise the bar for discussion. For example, I don’t really see how Alexa is really all that different from the design of any other smart speaker. They all appear to be fungible with different ecosystems accessible to them. Not sure about TV and phone products, but I’m not aware of any competitive ebook readers that offer a competitive mix of ease of use, price, etc (haven’t looked in a long time so my perception here may be dated).
And it’s important to note that they’re focus on training acceleration with these chips which is the path Google took with their chips. No reason to believe that they won’t be successful here for similar reasons in that a purpose built accelerator can outperform a general purpose design like a GPU.
Their consumer products are absolutely infuriating OCD triggers. For years in the Kindle app if you went back a page it would often start on a different paragraph than the first time you were on the page. The book reader didn’t implement the concept of a _page_ correctly for goodness sakes. And they clearly intended to emulate physical pages because they did implement a fancy page turn animation.
Similarly there’s plenty of sloppy in house software at any large company and they still produce good products in areas that matter to them (eg radar at Apple is both terrible and amazing, their internal directory app was a mess, etc).
Some links will be nice.
Here's [3] [4] Amazon claiming how their in-house Nitro SSDs keep improving. Here's [5] a comparison of AWS vs other cloud providers, noting how AWS leads in 7/10 metric categories one of which is disk performance and [6] is a similar report showing how AWS nitro disks lead in latency by a factor of 2x. The 2022 report [7] shows more mixed results so things may have equalized, but only because other providers are following Amazon and catching up with their own equivalent solutions, not because they're relying on third-party SSD vendors to build better NVMe drives.
But honestly, for things that are factual and as easily googlable as this, I would suggest you do your own research to become informed rather than expect to be hand-fed.
[1] https://www.percona.com/blog/comparing-graviton-performance-...
[2] https://blog.min.io/intel_vs_gravitron/
[3] https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/aws/aws-nitro-ssd-high-performa...
[4] https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/aws/introducing-storage-optimiz...
[5] https://www.trantorinc.com/blog/aws-vs-google-cloud-vs-azure
[6] https://www.cockroachlabs.com/blog/2021-cloud-report/
[7] https://www.cockroachlabs.com/guides/thank-you?pdf=/pdf/2022...