Hard disagree. I need to forward this post to my CISO and have them be impressed with my breadth of reading and depth of knowledge. When we chat over brewskies later, I want to be able to casually ask what they thought about using HMAC-SHA512 instead of GHASH for making salamanders more opaque. But I can't do that because the number of cartoon furries will make them think I'm not totes profesh. Maybe we can get this post in a more professional setting like LinkedIn or something?
And that ^ is how you invoke more furry art.
The art included in there is not of a bad quality, and they do link to the details of the artists including other art they had made which is also good.
But it does not really help with this article, either. They do not seem to be made specifically for this article; they show things which do not have much to do with it (this is not a criticism of the art or of the article, but of the way that the art is included in this article). It seems unnecessary to me to add such things into this article (it just takes up more space).
Both are fairly niche groups with no real geographic concentration. When someone can't cast around for a local club in town, the internet becomes a game-changer for finding the far-flung and diffuse others in the group. Then once you've found those other people (and related furry/security media to consume/publish) computers are again the way to get anything done, as opposed to snail-mail, phone calls or physical travel.
If actual research exists, Furscience might know: https://furscience.com/general-inquiries/
Here's a good documentary that gets into the history of it: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iv0QaTW3kEY
https://soatok.blog/2021/06/02/why-furries-make-excellent-ha...