Should Steve Jobs have said:
a) It's a tablet b) It's an iPad, or c) It's for consuming content in a relaxed and portable way?
Honest question. I'm curious what your approach would have been.
a) It's a tablet b) It's an iPad, or c) It's for consuming content in a relaxed and portable way?
Honest question. I'm curious what your approach would have been.
Indirect grammar is comparatively weak. It isn't "for consuming", it "consumes".
consuming content
No one "consumes content". They read, listen, watch, and play.
relaxed
A good writer conveys by action, not by description. If you say that a joke is funny, it is not funny.
portable
He wouldn't need to say this while holding the device in his hand. And he further conveyed this by describing the product's battery life.
So to conclude, Jobs would have said (and may have, I don't remember):
d) Here's a book (thumb, thumb), and here's a movie (play). Isn't that great?
Try saying that for your product.
The iPod, at least, was "1000 songs in your pocket", i.e., none of the above.
e.g., iPad is the simple and easy way to enjoy the things that matter to you.