In other words, don't tell me you have a "delicious, round edible item with just the right amount of firmness and sweetness to be pleasant to eat." Just tell me you have an apple, and I'll figure out the rest.
In other words, don't tell me you have a "delicious, round edible item with just the right amount of firmness and sweetness to be pleasant to eat." Just tell me you have an apple, and I'll figure out the rest.
a) It's a tablet b) It's an iPad, or c) It's for consuming content in a relaxed and portable way?
Honest question. I'm curious what your approach would have been.
The iPod, at least, was "1000 songs in your pocket", i.e., none of the above.
Indirect grammar is comparatively weak. It isn't "for consuming", it "consumes".
consuming content
No one "consumes content". They read, listen, watch, and play.
relaxed
A good writer conveys by action, not by description. If you say that a joke is funny, it is not funny.
portable
He wouldn't need to say this while holding the device in his hand. And he further conveyed this by describing the product's battery life.
So to conclude, Jobs would have said (and may have, I don't remember):
d) Here's a book (thumb, thumb), and here's a movie (play). Isn't that great?
Try saying that for your product.
e.g., iPad is the simple and easy way to enjoy the things that matter to you.