At least in the pro audio space, those qualities are actually desirable.
At least in the pro audio space, those qualities are actually desirable.
I’ve been working on an MN3205 with digital controls and pushing it well past its reasonable specs is very fun; 4096 stages really starts to fall apart past 300ms, and when you clock it down to more than a single second you get a wet robot fart out of the other end!
I should get myself some of those to play with, and you, friend, might enjoy a tape delay or two off ebay. (I have an Echoplex and it's tons of fun)
I'm always on the lookout for a deal on a space echo or echorec! Keeping them in working condition is not the easiest unfortunately, and it's tough to justify the real thing when incredible emulations exist (I highly recommend the Strymon Volante for scratching that itch)
"Am I having a stroke" comes to mind :) A bunch of drum mics? I'm no recording engineer, but I guess this is about mixing different signals from the same setup, with the signals having different delays (possibly due to filters, cables, or different types of mics)
Microphones at different distances receive a signal at different times. When combined, the signals are not phase aligned. This causes comb filtering where the combined waves reinforce and cancel each other.
Though that is sometimes desirable (e.g. comb filtering is important for spatial ambience such as reverb).
Some audio engineers find careful microphone placement solves many potential problems.
Drums are notoriously hard because modern recording techniques use many microphones on a kit.
Yeah this is about phase alignment of multiple sources. brudgers comment explains it quite eloquently.
Sounds like use.