All this articles insisting on the Beatles stuff are repetitive. There is life out of the 60's and concerts have evolved a lot since that.

Would not pay a dime for that crappy Beatles concert. Would pay for Pink Floyd pulse, U2 hanging car-lamps in Zooropa, the Michael Jackson anti-gravity boots, Ziggy and the Spiders of Mars, Alice Cooper or Marylin Manson ruling over the outrage rock theater, A-ha's Rock In Rio, Pink doing circus antics, Genesis, Dire Straits, Madonna, Radiohead, Chemical Brothers, Nirvana, Coldplay, Gaga, Swift, Robbie Williams, Parliament Funkadelic, Depeche mode ...

Any of those had astounding new original effects for its time, better lights, electronics and hardware and often very skilled musicians. I will not discuss that the Beatles songs are hugely popular but as musicians, they were average, and frankly a little boring on scene.

And this is just a western-centric and limited point of view of course. Can't talk about B'z or Glay concerts, for example.