Hacker News Reader

Comment by TheGateKeeper | Hacker News Reader

My question is: why are they storing the data anyways? Pass it along and don't keep it on the servers! Ignore all requests not authorized by a Warrant issued by a Judge.

View on HN

Or maybe it's time for phones to adopt PGP for text messages? You could collect your friends or colleagues public keys and then the telephone companies haven't the slightest idea what you're texting back and forth.

If you're using iMessage or BBM, they already can't provide any of that data to law enforcement. I'm not sure how Apple or RIM handles requests for users data from law enforcement though.

A while back there was talk of BBM being banned in some countries (India was one of them) because of the problem of monitoring BBM messaging.

http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,2009585,00.htm...

Miraculously, they were allowed to remain in service in those countries. It's safe to assume the nations didn't just give up on their quest to obtain access to the messaging data.

It wasn't miraculous, RIM capitulated and provided the keys to the kingdom. BBM is vulnerable.

I would not go that far, but I'd do make the data retention and disclosure policy clear.

And why wouldn't you go that far? There's no reason for a third party THAT I PAY SERVICE FEES TO to save my conversation. Transmission of the material until it reaches its client is the limit. ONLY WHEN any agency gets a warrant from a judge should they be given LIMITED ACCESS to the CURRENT messages being transmitted. Not have the ability to peruse the history of.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com