Intel is still tons more successful than 99.9% of companies out there. Specifically, they're still doing a $54 billion/year revenue, making it the ~260th largest company in the US (by revenue). This entire "if you're not leading, then you're losing" type of winner-takes-all mindset is fairly silly.
In some years Dell profitability basically depended on them not selling any AMD, because if they did, they would get the massive subsidy from Intel. These company were losing market share because they couldn't sell AMD systems, but that was preferable to not getting rebates.
This lead to massive anti-trust style lawsuits in Europe, the US, Japan and other places, and basically it lead to a 10 year legal battle that only ended because AMD was simply out of money to continue to fight the legal fight. So the made a settlement to get some cash.
If intel didn't have such insane market dominance, incredibly balance sheet and high margin for all the legal battle and all the fines, AMD would have really, really hurt them in the 2000s. But they could sustain the fight long enough and when AMD made a misstep, and Intel didn't, AMD crushed.
AMD kind of saved itself with consoles sales and then managed to turn it around with Zen.
AMD has been doing pretty well from a strategic point of view, specifically in high volume data centre SKUs, and so it's hard to see Intel being given as wide a window this time. And there are now also other players looking to take some market share, most notably Nvidia, but also all the big players are looking at their own in house ARM silicon.
The road back for Intel is not going to be nearly as wide and smooth as it was for Core.
You are literally leaving money on the table if you pick a processor not leading one of these (or being very good at 2-3 of these).
Sure, Intel isn't leading in any of these either – except maybe backwards-compatibility –, but there are more characteristics we care about than just the three you listed.
Also Tsmc keeps 50+% margin so does Amd so actual cost of processor is less than 20% of sale price. Intel foundry seems uncompetitive let alone it's current processor architecture.
Depends on how you define that, I’d bet that 99.9% of all companies aren’t losing billions of $ every quarter while their revenue is declining even more. Also while simultaneously failing in pretty much every market segment they operate in..