Sad state of science that real results cannot be published because it goes against the current dogma.
That is, in no way, why it had difficulty being published.
Wired magazine did a piece on him detailing how funding for this type of research was largely stonewalled because it ignored status quo ideas on cancer treatment.
My understanding is that traditionally ovt research was nearly impossible to get funding for but has begun to become easier as the status quo research and researchers from the 2000s have been replaced.
“A new scientific truth does not triumph by convincing its opponents and making them see the light, but rather because its opponents die, and a new generation grows up that is familiar with it.”
That's not the issue. The issue is that it's reporting results from self-experimentation, which simply from an objective results perspective has many conflicts of interest and accuracy.