If the issue is reusing names then they also shouldn't have named the radio lora with the same name as my aunt.
> I was excited to click the link to see how fine tuning LoRA frequencies I was using on my Mesh network would work.
You're thinking of LoRa radio, from Long Range. There's one of you in each LoRA comment section, I have a hard time believing it's an actual mistake in good faith anymore.
LoRA radio things are a lot more common than the newly popular AI stuff.
That depends on what your particular filter bubble contains. Just browsing HN should inform you that LoRA and fine tuning are common terms in AI, and even if you genuinely thought the article was about the radio technique there's really no reason to leave the same comment that's on every LoRA post.
If every post has similarly confusing titles then why shouldn't they deserve the same comment? The obvious solution is for people to stop using confusing titles. Something as simple as putting (AI) at the end of the title would go a long way towards fixing the problem.
Yes exactly. The AI crowd are the ones not arguing in good faith here. The title is very confusing as it stands right now.
'LoRa' ("Long Range") and 'LoRA' ("Low Rank Adaptation") have different capitalization.
Most search engines are capitalization agnostic, even the one here on HN. I'll have a word with my lawyer, I want to call something iphone, he says that's taken. I'll see if he likes IpHoNe any better to fix the capitalization. :-)
We could switch to just referring to everything as "the thing" or "the idea".
Or the AI guys could respect the namespace and call it LRA, a la RAG. What's next, WiFI?