Did I say any of that?
> rapist
Source?
> rapist
Source?
https://apnews.com/article/trump-rape-carroll-trial-fe68259a...
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/aug/07/donald-trump...
> Kaplan had already outlined why it was not defamation for Carroll to say Trump raped her.
> “As the court explained in its recent decision denying Mr Trump’s motion for a new trial on damages and other relief [in the New York case] … based on all of the evidence at trial and the jury’s verdict as a whole, the jury’s finding that Mr Trump ‘sexually abused’ Ms Carroll implicitly determined that he forcibly penetrated her digitally – in other words, that Mr Trump in fact did ‘rape’ Ms Carroll as that term commonly is used and understood in contexts outside of the New York penal law.”
So not a criminal case than? Trump didn’t even attend.
The article says the jury did not find enough evidence of the rape claim even at the lower requirement of the civil court.
> Carroll “cannot produce any objective evidence to back up her claim because it didn’t happen,” he told jurors.
I'm pretty sure OJ's lawyer also said he didn't do it.
But I’m not here to be trumps lawyer. I’m here to tell you that you that this scapegoating and conspiring is giving you nothing but anger and not helping you understand the events this week.