Looking at how the incentive structures are laid out, it's clear there's no incentive to be honest to normal people. They need the advertising dollars to exist, and we are suppose to trust big pharma's enormous advertising budget doesn't impact the business decisions at media companies? That's just big pharma, who else is playing the game?
There's no medical test to diagnose depression, all you can do is observe behavior and talk about it
Seeing bad behavior and lies over and over, decade after decade erodes trust and reveals the kind of people they are, if it was some radical group with no real power there would be less concern, but they have a tremendous amount of money and influence
They also shilled for Trump relentlessly, without pretense. But that's beside the point. The left should accept that they no longer represent the aspirations and priorities of the mainstream or even of ethnic minorities, and the right should stop with the underdog charade. They've swapped sides. Of course, neither side will make that admission anytime soon.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/News_media_endorsements_in_t...
Articles like these are predictable and a meme
https://www.axios.com/2024/11/05/presidential-election-newsp...
The bias is calling him an agent of russia, a fascist, a dictator, a nazi, and a threat to democracy for 8 years
It's calling him crazy about Hydroxychloroquine and then 6 months later saying the same thing
The bias is blatantly miss quoting him with what he said about Liz Cheney
The bias is only fact checking one candidate in a debate
The bias is associating a trump rally where Israeli flags were flying in MSG with a nazi rally in the 30s
The bias is suggesting that we are suppose to think he wants to put his daughter in a gas chamber who converted to judaism
Then there's the work of Robert Epstein: https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/Epstein%20Tes...
So who is saying you're supposed to think that, actually?
And you actually think they're important enough to pay any attention to?