Not the person you ask, but I have to think about this one (PNAS is pretty much a Science/Nature level journal impact wise). https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2202224119
https://arxiv.org/pdf/cs/0312018
which I think is a good paper from the viewpoint of "correctness" but on another level isn't a normal research paper as it isn't about one project. A lot of weird stuff goes on like this in academic publishing. When I was studying physics I got invited to present at a CS conference on Java in academic computing and didn't really understand the opportunity I would have had to have gotten a paper published pretty easily based on my attendance (e.g. really connections, I knew people who knew Geoff Fox who was organizing it)