https://arxiv.org/pdf/cs/0312018
which I think is a good paper from the viewpoint of "correctness" but on another level isn't a normal research paper as it isn't about one project. A lot of weird stuff goes on like this in academic publishing. When I was studying physics I got invited to present at a CS conference on Java in academic computing and didn't really understand the opportunity I would have had to have gotten a paper published pretty easily based on my attendance (e.g. really connections, I knew people who knew Geoff Fox who was organizing it)
My claim is that Molbio folks see the world like
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/View_of_the_World_from_9th_Ave...
where you replace "Manhattan" with "Molecular Biology" so something in another field is going to have to really stand out (be outrageous) otherwise the reviewer will say "This isn't important enough for Science, maybe they should consider submitting the paper to Physical Review Letters instead.”