Hacker News Reader

Comment by modeless | Hacker News Reader

Yeah WebRTC is a bear to implement for sure. Very poorly designed API. It can definitely provide significant performance improvements over web sockets, but only when configured correctly (unordered/unreliable mode) and not in every case (peer-to-peer is an afterthought in the modern internet).

View on HN

We got it in unreliable/unordered and it still barely moves the needle on network perf over websockets from what we see in north america connecting to another server in north america

I wouldn't expect a big improvement in average performance but the long tail of high latency cases should be improved by avoiding head-of-line blocking. Also peer-to-peer should be an improvement over client-server-client in some situations. Not for battle royale though I guess.

Edit: Very cool game! I love instant loading web games and yours seems very polished and fun to play. Has the web version been profitable, or is most of your revenue from the app stores? I wish I better understood the reasons web games (reportedly) struggle to monetize.

Thanks! The web versions of both of our mobile/web games do about the same as the IAP versions. We dont have ads in the mobile versions, so the ad revenue is reasonble. We're actually leaning more into smaller web games as a result of that. Profit on this game specifically I think it deserves better. I think Goober Dash is a great game, but it's not crushing it like I'd hoped.

That's really interesting, thanks! I agree Goober Dash deserves to be successful.

I would say WebRTC is both a must and only worth it if you need UDP, such as in the case of real-time video.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com