>Nothing unscientific or mystical about them
Do those things have any reputable evidence behind them?
Do those things have any reputable evidence behind them?
But actually, yes, some of them have, maybe not for this particular condition, but one can make reasonable inferences that some are worth trying. And anecdotes have value too.
>And anecdotes have value too.
No, they do not.
Incorrect. An absence of evidence is not the same thing as an absence of science.