At least then users can pick their own poison, rather than be force-fed one.
At least then users can pick their own poison, rather than be force-fed one.
Twitter used to soften the edge on this a bit; you engaged with a few [some thing] posts and you'd get 1 or 2 more over the next day. Now you can very quickly get into an infinite loop. The "algorithm" (and yes, I hate writing this) digs its claws in right after an engagement.
FB also shows me a lo of pseudo-science, similar history, etc. because of my interests in the real things. It has recently taken to showing me pictures of Eastern Europe for no apparent reason.
Overall, I really do not like Facebook (I’m only on there because some relatives are). I just think their algorithm is somewhat effective. I think I’ve managed to get them to label me as somebody with strong political opinions but low emotional valence toward politics, by marking some political posts or pseudo-political posts as offensive to me, but never allowing political content to “dwell” in premium screen space in the app.
Edit: I say I think their algorithm is effective, although I should say, I’m pretty sure I did trick it. In fact I’m very concerned about politics but I make sure to only angstily read articles I disagree with in Firefox browser with lots of tracking protection on.
Similar to me. Friends and relatives. Its also how the home education community in the UK communicates (I admin two groups, and that is my main reason for being on it regularly), an unfortunate reflection of the hold FB has on the demographic (middle aged because they are parents, mostly women because even in the 21st century men do not bring up kids).
Why do you think this is relevant, if the subject is Twitter's algorithm?
Your comment reads like whataboutism.