> I wonder how many they gained, if any significant amount
Very few, if any. WaPo already had a reputation as a liberal paper; one refusal to endorse a candidate is hardly going to convince conservatives to subscribe.
Very few, if any. WaPo already had a reputation as a liberal paper; one refusal to endorse a candidate is hardly going to convince conservatives to subscribe.
One of the major reasons for concern here is that the non-endorsement was the result of executive meddling by Bezos. If he's stepping in to override the paper's editorial positions, who's to say he wouldn't also interfere if the paper were to report on something he found inconvenient?